A US protester who was charged for utilizing a sandwich to assault a Customs and Border Safety (CBP) agent was discovered “not responsible” on Thursday after a jury determined that fees introduced by President Donald Trump's prosecutors have been baloney. The decision in Washington Capitol Sq. got here after 37-year-old Sean Dunn was accused of flinging a “sub-style sandwich” at an armed CBP officer on August 10 in a busy nightlife district following a barrage of shouted expletives, AP information company reported. Prosecutors initially sought severe felony fees beneath a marketing campaign ordered by President Trump to crack down on crime within the capital. Nonetheless, a grand jury refused to indict Dunn on any felony depend. A single misdemeanor cost was filed, carrying a most penalty of 1 12 months's imprisonment. Dunn was chased and launched instantly after the sandwich-throwing incident, solely to be arrested later in a extremely publicised White Home-announced raid on his residence. As video of the altercation went viral, he earned the nickname DC sandwich man and have become a logo of resistance to the President's regulation enforcement measures. Stylised photos of him in mid-attack appeared on posters, graffiti, T-shirts and at the same time as a well-liked Halloween costume.The highest Trump-appointed prosecutor in Washington, Jeanine Pirro, has pursued most penalties for arrests since taking workplace, together with in Dunn's case. Media evaluation of the President's crime crackdown reveals that many new arrests and indictments have stemmed from minor offences. On the trial's opening on Monday, Choose Carl J Nichols mentioned he anticipated proceedings to be transient, declaring “that is the best case on the earth.” Dunn's defence didn't dispute that he threw the sandwich, however argued that the act didn't represent an offence and described the prosecution as a “blatant abuse of energy.” Central to the trial was whether or not the tossing of a comfortable object might be deemed “forcible” and whether or not it impeded the officer's duties. Dunn, then a Justice Division paralegal, was dismissed from his place after the incident.
