Justice Sanjeev Narula made the statement whereas dismissing an utility filed by the girl's mother-in-law and late father-in-law. In an order handed on October 16, the choose held that the daughter-in-law can't be dispossessed besides by way of due authorized course of.
Advocate Samvedna Verma represented the daughter-in-law, whereas the parents-in-law have been represented by advocate Kajal Chandra.
Based on the petition, the dispute, spanning over a decade, arose after the daughter-in-law's marriage to the petitioner's son in 2010 and her subsequent residence together with her in-laws on the property.
The matrimonial relationship soured in 2011, resulting in a number of civil and prison proceedings between the events.
The petitioners contended that the property was the self-acquired property of the late Daljit Singh and, due to this fact, couldn't be deemed a shared family beneath the Safety of Girls from Home Violence Act.The courtroom, nevertheless, maintained that the prevailing association — the place the mother-in-law resides on the primary flooring and the daughter-in-law on the bottom flooring — adequately balances each events' pursuits.
