Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, showing for Khalid, instructed a bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and N V Anjaria that there was no restoration of funds, weapons or any materials proof linking him to the 2020 Delhi riots.
“There are 751 FIRs, I'm charged in a single, and if it is a conspiracy, it's kind of stunning!
“If I (Umar Khalid) conspired riots. On dates during which riots came about, I used to be not in Delhi,” Sibal stated and added that no funds, weapons and bodily proof connecting me to violence have been discovered but.
“No witness assertion truly connects petitioner to any act of violence,” he identified.
Sibal submitted that Khalid is entitled to bail on grounds of parity, noting that fellow activists Natasha Narwal, Devangana Kalita and Asif Iqbal Tanha had been granted bail in June 2021. Sibal stated that the Delhi Excessive Courtroom, whereas denying bail, had termed Umar Khalid's speech at Amravati on February 17, 2020, as “inflammatory.” “It's accessible on YouTube. It was a public speech the place I (Khalid) spoke about Gandhian rules,” Sibal added.
Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, showing for Gulfisha Fatima, argued that she has been in jail for 5 years and 5 months since April 2020.
Singhvi identified that whereas the primary chargesheet was filed on September 16, 2020, the prosecution has made it an “annual ritual” to file supplementary chargesheets yearly.
He submitted that there was an inordinate delay within the consideration of the bail plea of Fatima, which has been listed over 90 instances since 2020.
Singhvi said that the allegation towards his consumer is merely that she created a WhatsApp group to coordinate or mobilise help.
“However the actual take a look at in regulation, as laid down by the Supreme Courtroom, is whether or not there was any intent to incite violence or create disharmony,” he stated.
Senior advocate Siddharth Dave, showing for Sharjeel Imam, submitted that the police took three years to finish its investigation.
“Out of the 5 years I've spent in custody, three glided by as a result of the probe was nonetheless ongoing.
“The speeches had been delivered by me (Imam) practically two months earlier than the riots,” Dave stated and argued that there isn't a direct or proximate hyperlink to recommend that he might have incited the violence.
The listening to remained inconclusive and can proceed on November 3.
The Delhi Police on Thursday opposed the bail pleas of activists, saying that they conspired to strike on the sovereignty and integrity of the nation by a “regime change operation” executed underneath the guise of “peaceable protest”.
Khalid, Imam, Gulfisha Fatima and Meeran Haider had been booked underneath the Illegal Actions (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and provisions of the erstwhile IPC for allegedly being the “masterminds” of the February 2020 riots, which left 53 individuals lifeless and over 700 injured.
The violence erupted through the protests towards the Citizenship (Modification) Act (CAA) and the Nationwide Register of Residents (NRC).
