In line with a Delhi Excessive Court docket order issued on October 31 by Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sudhir Kumar Sirohi, each events knowledgeable the court docket that the mediation course of couldn't resolve the matter. The order famous that no laborious copies or joint schedules of paperwork have been filed but.
The court docket directed either side to submit photocopies of all admitted paperwork and put together a joint schedule. It additional requested the events to examine and flag their respective paperwork forward of the subsequent listening to.
The defendant has additionally been granted liberty to file a further affidavit of admission or denial if any new paperwork are submitted with the replication.
The case has been listed for listening to on February 3, 2026.
The dispute stems from IndiGo's objection to Mahindra Electrical's use of “6E” in its electrical automobile mannequin, the BE 6E. IndiGo filed a lawsuit in December final 12 months, alleging trademark infringement and in search of aid from the court docket's mental property division. Mahindra Electrical, a subsidiary of Mahindra & Mahindra, later clarified that its trademark software for “BE 6e” was filed beneath Class 12, which covers motor autos, distinguishing it from IndiGo's trademark, which falls beneath airline and associated providers. IndiGo, which makes use of “6E” as its callsign and key model identifier for merchandise like 6E Prime and 6E Flex, registered “6E Hyperlink” in 2015 for promoting and airline providers. Mahindra Electrical had final 12 months acquired trademark approval for “BE 6e” beneath Class 12, protecting varied motor autos however excluding two-wheelers.
