NEW DELHI: Pakistan's preliminary motive for creating nuclear weapons — to counter India — step by step advanced into an effort to create an “Islamic bomb” aimed toward aiding different Muslim nations, together with Iran, in line with former Central Intelligence Company (CIA) officer Richard Barlow.Barlow, who served as a counter-proliferation officer through the Nineteen Eighties when Islamabad was covertly advancing its nuclear programme, attributed this shift in intent to Abdul Qadeer Khan, extensively considered the daddy of Pakistan's atomic weapons challenge.Additionally Learn – ‘Unlawful nuclear actions preserving with Pakistan's historical past': India takes observe of Donald Trump's nuke testing comment – watch“Pakistan's major motive for creating nuclear weapons was to counter India. But it surely was additionally very clear from AQ Khan and the generals' perspective that it was not simply the Pakistani bomb; it was the Islamic bomb — the Muslim bomb,” Barlow advised information company ANI.“I feel AQ Khan was even quoted as soon as as saying, ‘We've received the Christian bomb, the Jewish bomb, and the Hindu bomb; we want a Muslim bomb.' It was very clear to me that Pakistan supposed to offer nuclear weapons know-how to different Muslim nations — which is what occurred,” he added.Nevertheless, the phrase “Muslim bomb” didn't originate with Khan however with then Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who initiated Pakistan's nuclear programme and positioned Khan at its helm.In the meantime, Barlow additionally alleged that Washington's response to Islamabad's secret nuclear dealings was marked by “negligence.”“Not solely did they (the USA) shut down from doing something about that in 1987 and 1988, however they did nothing for the following 20 to 24 years,” he remarked.Additionally Learn – ‘US managed Pakistani nuclear arsenal': Former CIA agent drops bombshell; reveals Washington anticipated India would strike after 26/11Right now, solely 9 nations possess nuclear weapons: Russia, the USA, China, France, the UK, India, Pakistan, Israel, and North Korea — in that order.Whereas India adheres to a No First Use (NFU) coverage, pledging to not use nuclear weapons except attacked first, Pakistan imposes no such restriction on itself.US President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that the battle between India and Pakistan in Might, was on the verge of turning nuclear, however that his “intervention” prevented an escalation and led to a ceasefire.‘A disgrace': Barlow on Indira Gandhi not approving joint India-Israel strike on Pakistan's nuclear facilityBarlow additionally claimed {that a} proposal by Israel to collectively bomb with India, Pakistan's Kahuta nuclear facility within the early Nineteen Eighties may have “solved a variety of issues.”The disapproval by the Indira Gandhi authorities was a “disgrace,” he stated.“I used to be out of presidency from 1982 till 1985. And I feel which will have occurred whereas I used to be out of presidency. I heard about it sooner or later. However I did not get my tooth into it as a result of it by no means occurred. It is a disgrace that Indira Gandhi did not approve it; it could have solved a variety of issues,” he said.In accordance with stories and declassified accounts, Israel and India had deliberate a pre-emptive airstrike on Pakistan's Kahuta uranium enrichment plant — the core of its nuclear programme — to stop Islamabad from creating and proliferating nuclear weapons, significantly to Iran, which is considered a “grave adversary” by Israel .Barlow urged that the US administration on the time, beneath then-President Ronald Reagan, would have strongly opposed any such strike, significantly from Israel, because it may have disrupted America's covert warfare effort in opposition to the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.
