Advocate Vijay Shankar Rastogi, who is a celebration to the case, mentioned District Choose Jay Prakash Tiwari rejected the switch software on Monday, stating that the petitioners weren't events to the unique go well with and therefore had no authorized standing to hunt such a switch.
The plea was filed by Manikuntala Tiwari, Neelima Mishra and Renu Pandey. They're the daughters of late Harihar Pandey, one of many litigants who filed the unique go well with.
Based on Rastogi, the plea submitted that they weren't being given enough time to current their facet earlier than the civil choose (senior division) quick observe the place the unique go well with is pending since 1991 and sought the case to be transferred to a different court docket.
Rastogi argued that the three sisters weren't listed as events within the 1991 go well with and due to this fact didn't have the locus standi to file a switch software.
After listening to arguments from either side, the district choose rejected the appliance, deeming it non-maintainable.The unique 1991 go well with pertains to the dispute over the Gyanvapi mosque advanced adjoining to the Kashi Vishwanath Temple. PTI
