Justice Sougat Bhattacharyya held that since particular go away petitions are pending consideration earlier than the Supreme Courtroom and the checklist containing names of tainted candidates was printed by the West Bengal Central College Service Fee (SSC) in reference to an order of the apex court docket of August 28, these usually are not match instances the place the excessive court docket ought to intrude.
He dismissed the petitions, refusing the petitioners' rivalry as untainted academics.
Justice Bhattacharyya famous that the Supreme Courtroom in its order of August 28 recorded the submission of the SSC's lawyer that the checklist of tainted candidates whose choice was put aside by the court docket could be positioned in public area on the web site of the fee inside seven days.
The petitions have been filed by candidates, whose names appeared within the checklist of tainted candidates, questioning the publication of an inventory containing names of such candidates in a memo dated August 30 by the SSC.
The checklist comprises names of 1,804 candidates who've been declared as tainted in reference to their participation within the first state-level choice check (SLST) in 2016 for courses 9,10, 11 and 12.Justice Bhattacharyya famous that the checklist was printed in accordance with an order dated August 28, handed on a Particular Depart Petition by the Supreme Courtroom.
as a Dependable and Trusted Information SupplyGreater than 25,000 instructing and non-teaching employees in West Bengal government-sponsored and aided faculties misplaced their jobs, together with these 1,804 candidates, as per a Supreme Courtroom judgment that discovered the whole choice course of as tainted.
