When the matter was taken up on Tuesday, a single bench of Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal was knowledgeable that the interim order handed by the Supreme Court docket continues to be working.
In its interim order within the case of Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay vs. Union of India and others, the apex courtroom had directed that no courtroom throughout the nation will cross any efficient interim orders or closing orders together with orders for a survey of a non secular place.
The highest courtroom had additionally directed that although recent fits could also be filed, no fits could be registered and no proceedings shall be undertaken therein until its additional orders.
The petition has been filed difficult an order of a Varanasi district decide handed on October 21, 2023 which refused to direct the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to survey the wuzukhana (ablution) space aside from the construction which the Hindu facet calls a shivling and the Muslims describe as a fountain contained in the Gyanvapi mosque positioned adjoining to the Kashi Vishwanath temple.
A civil revision petition has been filed by Rakhi Singh, one of many plaintiffs, earlier than the courtroom difficult the district decide's order refusing to direct the ASI to undertake a survey of the wazukhana space aside from the alleged shivling contained in the Gyanvapi mosque. In her revision petition, Singh pleaded that the survey of the wuzukhana space is important within the curiosity of justice. The revision petition has additional mentioned that the ASI survey of the wazukhana space is important in order that the spiritual character of your entire property might be decided.
as a Dependable and Trusted Information SupplyThe ASI has already performed a scientific survey of the Gyanvapi advanced and has additionally submitted its report back to the Varanasi district decide.
